A gun rights group in my region held an “Open Carry” night
at a restaurant this week. As folks do,
a handful or so of photos were posted on an attendees Facebook page and one of
my Facebook friends was linked in the post.
Two photos stood out to me and, while I realize keeping one’s mouth shut
is the best route generally, I felt the safety concerns I had were worth the
post. Here’s the short thread with “J”
that followed. (Names and faces have
been changed or blurred. Not interested
in bangin’ on these folks, just want to point how different points of view can
lead to unsafe gun handling – IMNSHO anyway.)
William
Keller: Honestly, how does this help us?? And as for
the folks with ARs . . . "Guns are always loaded" . . . I assume if
these are truly your defensive firearms the magazines are topped off and
there's a round in the chamber . . . "Never point your firearm at
something you're not willing to destroy" . . . what's in your field of
fire? Any folks forward of you? How about the other side of the walls?? SMH . .
. not helping, not helping.
J: You
are welcome to your opinion, you are welcome to join us, but to address your
concern, tonight almost 20 people peacefully assembled and shared time with
each other.
William
Keller: Quite happy 20 folks peacefully assembled. But
safely? Not so much, IMO. We are either all diligent in the safe handling of
our weapons . . . or we are not. From the photos it would be virtually
impossible for someone to have not been muzzled by one or both ARs. I see this
as unacceptable.
J: You
are so wrong about this safely concern. When We Gather it is the safest
restaurant in the country during that time in which we are assembled. Your
paranoia is completely misplaced and objectively wrong.
William
Keller: With all due respect Jim, I'm pretty happy
with my safety concerns. As an NRA Trainer, NRA Training Counselor, NAPSI
Master Instructor and an adjunct law enforcement trainer, I do not see it as paranoid,
I simply see unsafe gun handling and that is unacceptable.
J: Just
because you're an NRA trainer doesn't mean you're not paranoid. Even educated
people or wrong sometimes. Feel free to join us, we always explain to people
what the rules are , and we've been doing this for over 4 years safely.
What sad to me William , is your clear lack of understanding for those of us who gather peacefully. Nobody is making you join us.
I've already explained to you once that we are just a group of people gathering peacefully and don't hurt or bother others. That is another way that we are helping people in this country experience the freedoms our forefathers gave us. Join us or drop it.
What sad to me William , is your clear lack of understanding for those of us who gather peacefully. Nobody is making you join us.
I've already explained to you once that we are just a group of people gathering peacefully and don't hurt or bother others. That is another way that we are helping people in this country experience the freedoms our forefathers gave us. Join us or drop it.
William
Keller: Alrighty Jim, understood. Peace.
There’s a fair amount of meat
on this particular bone so let’s just nibble on it and see what we can find.
The general gist I took from “J’s”
response is that the place they assembled is “the safest restaurant in the country during that time in which we are
assembled”. I will make the
assumption that what he means by this is that while 20 armed folks are in the
building some ass-hat isn’t going to come in and rob the place. On a cynical level this is simply untrue if
the robber doesn’t know their gathering is being held. Robbers are creatures of opportunity. If they see an opportunity – and have no clue
there are 20 armed citizens holding a get together in the back – they may very
well decide that today is a good day to take a run at the place. Ya just gotta wonder how 20 armed citizens
would choose to react if a couple armed criminals would hit the place.
How about the other end of the
spectrum . . . say a local bunch of MS13 critters decide they’d like to pick up
some more guns? Couple of members pop in
with a their AKs, put the whole “I’m gonna shoot their ass if they come here”
thing to the test and then they take the guns and walk out the door.
This attitude is what I call
the “talisman effect”. Because I have a
gun on me, I’m safe. This is wrong . . .
wrong, wrong, wrong. What makes you “safe”
is awareness of your surroundings, good gun handling skills and a willingness
to use those skills to defend yourself, your family and those around you. The gun is just the tool you have at hand. “Murphy” can be a bitch at a time like this,
don’t tempt him.
My second take-away is that I’m
obviously “paranoid”.
Paranoid: extremely fearful was so paranoid that he was afraid to walk the
streets
characterized by suspiciousness,
persecutory trends, or megalomania behaving in a paranoid manner with accusations of persecutions
My response is . . . “Yep,
sure the hell am!” And that is why when
I teach a class there is no ammunition in the classroom, I verify that each and
every weapon is empty and insure that two others do so. I insist that if a weapon is on a table top
it’s pointed is a safe direction, bolt open or slide locked back, ejection port
up so I (and anyone else) knows it’s empty.
It’s why we do an emergence response brief to clearly define what the
group that day will do should someone blow out their femoral artery. It’s why I always have a blowout kit with me.
It’s why I obey “Da
Rules”. When handling firearms on
the range, with a group of folks or out in public these, and only these, are Da
Rules. Period.
It’s why I carry every day everywhere
I legally can. We do not get to choose
the time or place – the predator does.
Does this make me “paranoid”? No,
it makes me a realist. Any one of us, at
any time, can come up against “their day”, and a gun at home is the safe won’t
do you a damn bit of good. Carry
it. Every day.
Attitude also comes into play
here. Honestly, I have no issue with
Open Carry. I don’t do it. I believe it gives up a tactical
advantage. I believe it draws an
unwanted amount of attention to me. I
believe it makes the risks higher that an aggressive and determined predator
would pick me as a target. I do not see
the “coolness” factor of open carry.
Yes, it openly demonstrates my 2nd Amendment rights . . . but
makes me less safe and definitely a “shoot him first” kind of target. So, I pass on it.
And, I don’t understand the
whole open carry of an AR either. I have
a vehicle gun, it is an AR. It is loaded
and in “patrol ready” – 28 rounds in the magazine, chamber empty. If you see me with an AR slung around my neck
there’s a round in the chamber and 27 more in the magazine. I will have full control of it and it will
traditionally be pointed down and on a 2-point sling. It will NOT be sitting on a table, magazine
in, bolt forward and bipod extended. How
the hell do you not muzzle someone when your weapon is in that state?? I’m sure the argument will be . . . “Yes, yes,
but it’s not loaded, I just brought it for show and tell.” If that’s the case – and I pray it was in the
instances shown in the photo – it’s still profoundly unsafe to handle a weapon
in the manner shown by the photos. We can
all google up hundreds of articles of folks shot by other folks with “empty”
guns. Remove the frickin’ magazine, lock
the bolt back, choose a designated area in the room to be the “safe” area and a
direction to be the “safe” direction . . . and then I’ll be a bit happier.
I’m not trying to pick a fight
here, but if you care about safe gun handling – this is not the way to go about
it. Follow “Da Rules”, insist that those
around you do as well and be a good example.
No comments:
Post a Comment