Friday, September 30, 2016

Review - AAR NAPSI Instructor Development Course 9-22-25-2016


Thursday . . . September 22 was “the day”!  The day that years of development, testing, tweaking and just plain old hard work reached its conclusion.  NAPSI conducted it’s very first – of many to come – “Instructional Methods and Procedures” and “Foundations of Defensive Pistol Instructor Development” courses.  It was a very good four days.

The purpose of this AAR is to fully describe the NAPSI coursework, the requirements to become a NAPSI instructor and then to lay out a full AAR of the four days of instruction.  As Kirk would say . . . Buckle Up!

First – why even bother developing a new set of coursework.  Well . . . to be perfectly honest . . . the answer is simple – Need!  The harsh reality in today’s training world is that the majority of folks looking for a carry permit are interested in taking a single solitary course, period!  In our (the founding members of NAPSI) opinion there are few courses out there that provide a solid foundation of defensive shooting to their students.  There are very solid “shooting sports” courses, some “out there” tacti-cool courses, some very good shooting only courses . . . but not many that cover things from parts of a SA Revolver to the foundations of defensive shooting.  That was missing in our opinion and that was our focus as we developed our coursework.

Next, and equally important, is actual instructor development.  Teaching an instructor how to actually teach solid coursework.  Providing them the training to effectively present our material to their students.

Finally, to develop a “product”.  In this case the “Foundations of Defensive Pistol” and the associated “Foundations of Defensive Pistol Instructor Development” coursework to teach the instructor candidate how to teach the actual course.  It’s easy to see how developing this coursework spanned years.  We wrote it, taught it to peers, rewrote parts, taught it to peers, had our own development conferences with the founding members to work on and polish it, taught it to beta groups, tweaked again, more development conferences . . . all to get to September 22nd.  It’s been a good journey.  It’s been a challenging journey.  And, it’s been a worthwhile journey.  We are proud of what we have, what we have done and on Sunday afternoon, September 25th . . . we were very proud of our first four new instructors – Jim, Kenny, Sean and Jim.  So let’s talk about the process.

Before any instructor candidate was considered, they had to actually attend a “Foundations of Defensive Pistol” course.  We’ve held a number of them in the Midwest in Iowa, Missouri and Illinois.  Why?  At the lowest level – how can you teach what you haven’t taken?  And at the opposite end – what better way to decide if you want to teach a course than to take it first to see if you and it are a fit.  From the corporate side – it’s a “qualifier” . . . if you’re not serious enough to take the course, you probably aren’t serious enough to actually teach it.  It is NOT our intent to find out how many instructors we can create.  It IS our intent to create solid, focused and skilled instructors to teach our coursework.  Taking the course seems like a minimal effort.

Next we expect an instructor candidate to be actively learning.  We expect them to be taking coursework annually.  As part of the instructor application each individual was expected to list their existing teaching certifications as well as list what coursework they had taken with us paying special attention to annual training.  Our belief is that if instructors are not taking coursework . . . they are not growing, not learning and will probably not be a good fit for NAPSI.

Personal references are also a must – we require three.  These are folks who will be able to vouch for the candidate and hopefully be able to vouch as to their teaching and shooting ability. 

An individual resume is also expected.  Who is the candidate, what are their skills, their level of training, their goals?

The instructor candidate must have a current certification in some level of first aid – from a Red Cross First Aid cert to an EMT – some level of training is required and must be kept current.

All of this is followed by an individual interview by two of the founding members of NAPSI.  These averaged an hour or so with a list of about 20 questions that we asked and listened to.  It was our opportunity to get a “feel” for the candidate, see how they responded when put on the spot and allowed us one more level of evaluation.  Both interviewers were required to approve the candidate for them to move forward.

And finally, a shooting test.  30 rounds, 15 feet on a LETargets SEB target with passing score of 80% being required. 

Get past all of this . . . and the person became a member of our very first Instructor Development course.  We had a dozen-ish inquiries where applications were sent out.  Four followed through.  And we were happy with that.

Our first Instructor Development Course was hosted by Pistol Prep Academy in Atlanta, IL under the ownership of Annette Chapman.  She has a great training facility and has hosted the majority of our development conferences.  We began promptly at 8AM on Wednesday the 22nd . . . and finished 7PM-ish.  Let’s call it a “solid” day.

The first two days of the course focused on the “Instructional Methods and Procedures”.  There are two primary goals of this set of coursework – to teach the instructor how to teach according to NAPSI guidelines.  And, to essentially introduce the candidate to the corporate culture of NAPSI.  Both are important.  Both are necessary to develop a cadre of dedicated, educated, focused and mutually supportive instructors.  If we all aren’t on exactly the same page, if we aren’t all headed in the same direction . . . we will fail.  It is not our intention to fail, so we are investing two days up front to develop our instructor candidates into fellow team mates.

“Instructional Methods and Procedures” consists of four chapters, each with specific areas of focus as well as a number of Appendices meant to round out the coursework.

Chapter 1 – Ethics

We’ve all seen far too many “instructors” put speed and dollars ahead of solid instruction.  It is our expectation that a NAPSI instructor follow our general list of ethical guidelines, that they adhere to our Code of Ethics, that they interact with students in a respectful way as well as with fellow instructors.  And finally, that conflicts with either students or fellow instructors are resolved “peaceably”. 

Chapter 2 – Standards of Cirriculum

We have developed seven tenets of a Defensive Shooting Program.  They get us on the “same page”.  We expect candidates to follow them as well as maintaining high standards of training, high individual standards, high levels of proficiency and that courses be reported and documented in a timely fashion.  It’s hard to expect adherence to corporate expectations if we don’t teach them – hence Chapter 2.

Chapter 3 – Policies and Procedures

We are a corporation, with a well-defined corporate culture.  This is where that culture is taught.  From the use of the NAPSI name and images to training material, roles and responsibilities, corporate hierarchy, the use of training teams, instructor fees and range operation.  It’s a busy chapter meant to more fully define the culture that is contained within NAPSI.

This is about where day one ended.  Well . . . kinda ended in “Chubbies” over a couple adult beverages and some great burgers.  On the NAPSI side, we all walked away from the day pretty happy with how it went . . . from the candidate side we drained them pretty dry but they all left with their head still in the game and looking forward to day two.

Chapter 4 – Methods of Instruction

This is a huge chunk of information . . . big, enormous, lots and lots of data.  General topics covered the function of training, plausibility principle (H/T to Rob Pincus), principals of adult learning, types of learners, variables that affect learning, skill development, other theories of teaching, being confident and competent, types of communication, keys to teaching a new skill, instructional aids, evaluating student performance and working with students with disabilities.  An action packed day!  We wrapped up talking about course check lists, how to organized your course, marketing and promotion, running a successful business and various course templates.  We ended the day heading back to our B&B and to a home cooked meal courtesy of Tracie.  Honestly, I cannot thank her enough for taking care of us – home cooked breakfasts, home cooked meals in the evening . . . MMMMMMmmmmmmmm!!

And so ended our “Introduction to Methods and Procedures”.  One thing to keep in mind here . . . not only did we need to develop this portion of the coursework, we had to develop the coursework to actually teach “Introduction to Methods and Procedures”.  That is the only way we are able to ensure that the next time we teach this course (after the first of the year), it will be taught in a consistent fashion.  At the end of the two days as the NAPSI SITs gathered in the living room of our B&B, we had a chance to assess of first two days.  Bottom line we were more than pleased.  We found a few areas that we will tweak – but we all agreed that things had gone well and we were looking forward  to the candidates teaching the “Foundations of Defensive Pistol” the following day and we were all looking forward to the range work on Sunday.

Day 3 – Foundations of Defensive Pistol

Again, remember that to present this material to candidates two pieces of coursework are required.  First is the coursework the candidate will use to teach this to their students.  The second is the coursework that allows NAPSI to teach this coursework to instructor candidates in a consistent manner.  It’s simply not a matter of throwing together a power point or a handful of drills – it takes real effort to put “meat on the bones”.

This day is entirely in the hands of the candidates.  There are seven classroom lessons.  These were distributed in bits and pieces to the candidates and they were given time to prepare and then then were required to do a “teach back” to those in the classroom.  There was a lot of material . . .  an introduction to revolvers and semi-automatic pistols, firearm safety and safe gun handling, an introduction to holsters, belts and off body carry.  This was followed by an introduction ao ammunition, range safety, care and cleaning of handguns, the fundamentals of defensive shooting, mindset and selecting a defensive firearm.

This was a full day with hours of candidate taught lessons and immediate feedback provided by follow candidates and the SITs.    This is the rubber/road interface where an instructor candidate must simply step up and show what they’re made of.  Again, we were pleased with the results.  This ended the classroom portion of the coursework – Sunday, the 25th would be the range day.

Day 4 – Range Work

First out of the chute was the instructor candidate qualification shoot.  30 rounds, 15 feet with a score of 80%, they could “drop 6”.  We allowed about a 50-round warmup.  I loaded three magazines with a total of 40 rounds and shot my own personal qual target.  Honestly, this is one of my expectations of every instructor I teach.  You need to shoot the qual course first . . . and you need to pass – period.  I shot an extra 10 rounds since we didn’t want to give away the actual course of fire but I was happy with the result – I dropped 4 out of 40 for a 90%.  Not bad shooting it cold.

After the warmup Chris called the course of fire.  Two passed out of the box . . . and two required a reshoot.  Not unusual, it is amazing what shooting on demand in front of peers can do to one’s accuracy.  At the end of the day everyone had “met spec”.

Next came the teaching of the live fire drills.  There are three primary lessons – an Introduction of Defensive shooting, Use of Cover and Concealment and finally a final shooting qualification course of fire.  There are 18 live fire exercises.  One builds on the other until the final qualification course of fire.  Each candidate was assigned a specific drill, or portion of a drill.  They were evaluated on their teaching ability with live fire, they were corrected, encouraged and expected to be able to demonstrate their ability to safely and correctly teach the assigned shooting drill.  Again, we were very pleased with what we saw.

Once the range work was complete there was the 1-hour final.  Ten essay questions that demanded that the candidates be able to articulate what they had been learning over the past 4 days.  Honestly, I had my doubts of making this an essay test – but I was personally pleasantly surprised.  The answers were clear, well thought out and definitely showed that we had four candidates deserving of receiving their NAPSI Defensive Pistol Shooting Coach certificate.

Passing out their certificates, final pictures and a heck of a wind/rain storm ended our first Instructor Development Course.

Looking back . . . the work has been worth it.  The hours and hours writing, testing, peer review, development conferences, the hundreds of hours and probably thousands of dollars of personal investment by the founding members has delivered exactly what we had hoped, a Foundations of Defensive Pistol course we are all proud of, and an Instructor Development set of course work that will insure that those who wish to teach this coursework to their own students will provide simply the best to their student.

Jim, Sean, Kenny and Jesse – congrats on your completion of the very first Instructor Development Course.  Thank you for all your hard work!

For those interested in following in their footsteps – we will be posting a 2017 schedule soon, keep an eye out.  In the meantime, you are welcome to contact us any time.  We will do our best to answer your questions.  Contact information can be found at NAPSITraining.com. 





Training - The "Drive, Touch, Press" Drill

A video for you consideration . . . Isn't that "snappy" . . . a video no less!! :) One of the things I do as an instructor is to try to help a shooter fix their "foundational" issues . . . stance, grip, where they touch the trigger, how well they hold their grip through the firing sequence, how they drive their firearm to the threat . . . the foundations of their shooting. The drill I use for that is the "Drive, Touch, Press" drill. And this is what that looks like . . . see what you think . . .

Here's a closer look at the "Drive, Touch, Press" drill . . .

https://www.facebook.com/eiaft/videos/vb.571161966/10154593508031967/?type=2&theater&notif_t=like&notif_id=1475249824544341

Sunday, September 18, 2016

Training – “What we have here is a failure to kamooooon-icate . . . “


Communicate:    to convey knowledge of or information about

to transmit information, thought, or feeling so that it is satisfactorily received or understood

So I’m leaving my client’s offices and headed to Ernie’s store to see if he has any SKS Stripper Clips.  He’s outside suckin’ on a cigarette and sees me coming across the parking lot.

“Damnit Bill . . . you missed the whole point!  Rob gave us a call and chewed my butt!!”  and so began the conversation about my Facebook post about two specific drills I shot for the Combat Focused Shooting course I took a few weekends ago.  The conversation with Ernie showed an interesting and disjointed process of . . . the purpose of the drill . . . how it was explained . . . what the goals were . . . what my goals were . . . my mental purpose while shooting the drills . . . and what I chose to write about.

“What we have here is a failure to kamoooooon-icate . . .”

First – let me allow you all to read the post that started this all . . .

----------------------

OK . . . just a bit of braggin'. . . I spent this past Sunday training with our local PD. They had brought in the Combat Focused Shooting course from Rob Pincus with local instructors Ernie and Mike. Both are LEOs. These photos are two different drills. The first (one with drawings on it) was intended to show your accuracy as your speed increased. First target was the Red "1" circle. The drill was 5 rounds spaced 1 second apart at a distance of 9 feet. (The one flyer off to the left was from an earlier drill) Got all 5 within the circle.

Next drill was 5 rounds, 1/2 second apart on the Green "3" circle. Again, the shooting gods were on my side.

Finally the last drill was 5 rounds on the Blue "5" circle as fast as you could press the trigger. Gotta say I was pretty happy with the results.

Next drill - "Around the world". 6 rounds - one per circle. We did this 4 times. You drew once while moving to the side, drove to the target and fired the round. You did a complete scan for other bad guys, stepped sideways in the opposite direction, drove out and fired again . . . repeat until you missed or completed all 2 targets. Got'em all. smile emoticon:) Next drill, same as above but you could use as many rounds as you needed to put 1 round in each circle. Again, got them all with the first shot. Third drill, same as the last . . . and once again I shot it clean. The final drill, again same as above - but we were to push out time and do it as fast as we could and still get the hit. Again, the gods were favorable - and it was a clean round.

 4 drills, 24 rounds . . . and zero misses! I'll take it!! smile emoticon:)

It was a long, hot and very rewarding day! Thanks to Mike and Ernie for their time, it was a great course!


----------------------
Communication is a complicated thing.  From the instructor’s POV there is what I want to say and then what I actually say.  From a student’s POV there is what I heard and how I interpret it.  The two may not resemble each other in the slightest.  When I have my instructor hat on I am fond of asking the question “does that make sense??”  That allows a student the opportunity to think and respond to what I am asking and it allows me a chance to hear what they understood from what I said. 

In coursework – especially coursework that is taught by multiple instructors – what you should expect is that “the course” should be taught the same each time regardless of the instructor.  In this case I was going through the 1-day Combat Focused Shooting course taught by two local instructors, Ernie and Mike.  I’ve taken the 2-day version from Rob Pincus and the 1-day carbine also from Rob.  Rob’s company has an instructor development process that is very rigorous and it produced what I expected – consistency.  What I heard from Ernie and Mike was exactly what I heard from Rob.  The flow, the drills, the “words” to explain the “whys and how’s” were essentially the same.  THAT is how it should be.  Good coursework that is taught by multiple instructors should come out the same, regardless who teaches it.  THAT is the job of the instructor – and those who taught them.

That said . . . what also plays into the mix is where the student’s head is while they are tking the course.  Here’s what was going on for me.

As is usual for me (and I expect most shooters) – I don’t want to look stupid.  I want to do well and demonstrate that I’m a competent shooter.  On top of that this particular course is being conducted for our local community LEOs – who I help train.  Just a bit more pressure added – I need to demonstrate to them that I’m a solid shooter – otherwise why should they even bother to listen to me?  And finally – I’ve literally spent a couple thousand rounds this year working specifically on my shooting accuracy and trigger control.  All of this is at the front of my brain throughout the entire course.

As you can see – there is a fair amount going on between the instructors teaching and me listening, learning and shooting.  All this affects the ability to “kamooooon-icate”.

So how does all of this relate to the butt chewin’?  First was the expectation that all the drills were to be taught from a very specific POV.  The first drill in questions was firing 5 rounds in 3 different circles.  The first circle the rate of fire was to be 1 round per second.  The next circle was 1 round per ½ second and the final circle was 5 rounds as fast as you could press the trigger.  The purpose was to have the shooter see that as they shot faster the groping typically opens -  all rounds within the 2 inch circle for the first circle and a fist/palm sized group for the last when the rate of fire was as rapid as you could make it is how it usually goes.  And that is how it went for 8 out of 10 of us on the line.  THAT was the lesson – the hits were still effective even though the group opened up.
In my particular case – since I’ve spent so much time and energy increasing my accuracy and controlling my trigger press – what I wanted was to have the speed . . . but I really wanted all the rounds for all three circles to all be within the circle.  That was where my focus was – regardless of what Ernie and Mike communicated.  I was successful at that and I “tooted my own horn” in my post about it.  Which communicated that I missed the whole point of the exercise as far as Rob was concerned (we’ll see if I’m getting this right as far as he’s concerned in this post).  Actually – I do get it, I was just happy I met my goals.

The thing I like about the exchange Ernie had with Rob is that is shows they both care that what they are trying to teach is fully understood.  Good coursework, good instructors hammer on the little stuff.
The second drill that Ernie got tapped on was the “take a lap” drill which I mistakenly called “Around the World”.

There’s a lot happening in this drill.  Single round engagements on 6 circles with movement and a complete scan and assess after each round along with reloads as necessary.  Ernie pointed out I got the sequence out of order.  The first lap you had 6 rounds only and had to stop on the first miss.  Second time you could use as many rounds as you needed to put 1 round in each circle.  Third lap again as many rounds as you needed but you needed to accelerate your pace.  And the last lap was back to a only 6 rounds to complete the lap stopping on the first miss.  (hope I remembered the order right this time)

The question asked at the end was – which lap caused the greatest amount of pressure.  For me it was the very first lap – going back to my desire to perform well.  Typically, it seems the last lap causes more anxiety because the shooter is back to only 6 rounds to complete the lap.  The bottom line for me again goes back to the idea that I’d spent a great deal of time and energy working on both accuracy and trigger press – I expected to complete each lap and I expected to do that with only 6 rounds per lap . . . which I did.

So what does this all mean and why even discuss it.  My point is that everyone comes to the course with their own abilities, their own focus and their own expectations.  The instructors know what they want to teach, hopefully they’ve been trained enough that the coursework flows well and they can clearly articulate each and every drill.
Students also come with their own expectations, skill levels and goals.

How the words are spoken, how things are demonstrated, how the coursework flows are the responsibility of the instructors.  How the words are heard, how the drills are executed and how well the student listens are the responsibility of the student.  What allows these things to mesh is our ability to “kamooooon-icate”.
At some level – we had a failure to kamooooon-icate.  It didn’t affect the effectiveness of the course but it did indicate that my head was elsewhere in a couple of instances . . . and that the instructors cared enough to clear things up.  And THAT is what you expect for a solid training company.

Thanks to Ernie and Mike for your time, I picked up a ton of things to continue to work on.  And thanks to Rob – always good to know you’re watching how things are going.


Monday, August 1, 2016

Training – It’s always the foundation!

A text conversation with a friend this past week  . . .

Friend:  Here’s my question Keller.  How far do you have to stick your finger in the trigger guard to make a Glock Shoot To the Left?

Me:  Shooting left implies to little finger.  Try just a touch more.

Friend:  By the way that was said with levity . . . . . J

A day later . . .

Friend:  Got any range time today??

I wish I had a nickel for every time I’ve heard the phrase “Shootin’ low left??  Must be a Glock!”  A pistol is a pistol . . . period.  Keep good sight alignment, keep a good sight picture . . . press the trigger straight to the rear . . . and you will send each and every round through the same hole.  Period.  Past this basic “truth” . . . it gets a bit more complicated – and remains simple – all at the same time.

When I’m trying to work with a shooter who is having a problem like this I automatically default to a “Drive, Touch, Press” drill.  From the High Compressed Ready the shooter Drives the front sight to the target, Touches the trigger to take up the slack and then smoothly Presses the trigger straight to the rear.  It is a drill that “moves” slowly allowing an instructor to get some good work done . . . let me explain.

I begin with the “Load and make ready” command.  I can evaluate how they load their firearm, how they rack the slide.  The magazine insertion should be one smooth movement.  The slide rack should be done with their dominant arm’s elbow pinned to the side and the support hand grasping the slide over the top and at the rear of the slide.  Firmly move the slide rearward and simply let go, allowing the gun to do the work it was designed to do.

Once loaded you can begin to work with the shooter.  I start with the stance, check their feet – shoulder width apart, check their toes making sure both feet are aimed at the threat.  Next I look for slightly bent knees.  I want their elbows close to the body, firearm at a point that is approximately at the same level they “join” hands to grip when they draw and I want the front sight already pointing directly at the threat.

On “Drive!” I want to make sure that their finger is at its “home” on the dominant hand side of the firearm and that the front sight drives straight to the target (no “casting” or “bowling”).  If you see this, have them come back to the High Compressed Ready and repeat it slower until it is correct.  I also expect to see them lean slightly into the gun putting their body weight behind the gun to help with recoil management.  By breaking the firing sequence up this way you can work on each little piece of their presentation and firing sequence. 

Another piece evaluated during the “Drive” is their grip.  I did a post about “Get a Grip” quite some time ago that covers the basics but one thing I want to hammer on just a bit here is that the meaty part of the palm of your support hand should have full contact with the grip of the firearm.  One of the biggest issues I see is that the shooter’s grip does not cover a full 360 of the grip . . . there are little gaps, or the meat of the support hand palm is not fully resting on the grip but rather on part of the meat of the dominant hand.  This provides space for energy to escape which will affect the way your firearm responds when you press the trigger.  You need a firm, full 360-degree grip on your firearm.  Again, by slowing things down and taking this step by step, you can see and fix these things.

Next – “Touch” the trigger.  Again, with this step-by-step process you can fully evaluate their finger placement.  This is especially valuable in evaluating the fit of the handgun.  Sometimes the shooter is trying to use a firearm that just plain doesn’t fit their hand.  Small person, full sized Glock 17 . . . may not work well.  Or a moose of a guy with a subcompact might not fit well either.  Fit matters.

The advice I gave my friend is where I typically start when a shooter is placing rounds “low left”.  Too little finger has a tendency to push the barrel left when pressing the trigger.  Too much finger has a tendency to pull the barrel right when pressing the trigger.  I use the word “tendency” because every shooter is an individual.  What causes an issue with one shooter may not with another.  Still, I need a place to start – and this is mine.  My starting position for finger placement is 1/3 the distance back from the tip of the trigger finger to the 1st joint.  After that each shooter “tweaks” it so if feels good, is repeatable and effective for them.

We also discuss the “take up” of the trigger.  This is best practiced with an empty firearm, but I continually remind them of how it feels to take up the slack in the trigger before we move to the “Press” command.  We also talk about shooting off the reset, meaning that the trigger finger never goes fully forward after the round is fired but forward enough to only reset the trigger set – then the string is continued.  Shooting off the reset allows the shooter to better control the firearm for the next shot, eliminates the tendency to “slap” the trigger and decreases the time between rounds in the string.

Finally, there is the “Press” . . . said over an extended period of time . . . “ppppprrrrreeeeessssssssss”.  This allows me to convey the idea of a smooth trigger press and not a PRESS!!!.  The thing I watch for here is first and foremost a smooth front to rear movement and not a slap/jerk/quick pull process.  Once the round is done I look where the hole magically appeared.  I will also throw thoughts in during the “Press” . . . “watch the sight alignment, watch the sight picture, firm grip, lean in a bit more”.  While there are only three primary components – Drive, Touch, Press – there is also stance, grip, sight alignment, sight picture to keep in mind.  For new shooters – and as in the case of my very experienced friend – reminders when at the very beginning of the drill set will pay off big time as the session proceeds.

For my friend, shooting a LETargets SEB defensive target we went from 30% on one of the circles to 100% on a square within about 75 rounds and about an hour and 15 minutes of one-on-one instruction.  The hits did indeed begin low and left and ended with a rather largish hole in the middle of the last square.

Honestly, it’s seldom “the gun”.  Nor is it some convoluted stance or grip or method of aiming.  “Fixing” things invariably boil down to foundational issues.  So, how can you “fix yourself” if you are having some issues?  Three primary answers there.

First – seek good instruction.  A couple hours with an instructor for some tweaking and fine tuning may save you hundreds of rounds of ammunition and hours/days/weeks of frustration.  Self-Help – walk yourself through the above process being exacting and deliberate at each and every step.  From the “Load and Make Ready” to the final round fired.  Call out the Drive, Touch, Press commands aloud and pay attention to what you do each and every step.  Finally, virtually the entire population now walks around with a high definition video camera in their pockets.  Set up your phone and record yourself again being exacting and deliberate through each step, each command and each round.  Call out each step.  Self-assess on the video speaking the notes as you go through each round.  Once you’ve done 20 rounds viewed from the dominant side – repeat the process from the support side.  Then, review the video noting EVERYTHING. 

There are no secrets to fast, accurate and effective rounds on a threat.  There is simply a set of foundational information that must be executed well for each and every shot.


You are the answer to this . . . and you alone.  Do the work . . . it’s as simple as that.  

Saturday, July 9, 2016

Commentary . . . Do your job . . .


So . . . how do we fix “this” . . . 5 cops dead, 6 wounded . . . just in Dallas.  LEO murders up 44% this year.  A nation being pushed to the brink of a race war helped along by a President who slanders police officers, decries “white privilege”, hammers that blacks are being targeted simply because they are black.  And all of us sitting here, knowing more is coming . . . watching BLM members throwing bottles, rocks and bricks at police officers, reading the call of the New Black Panthers to “kill pigs” . . . . how do we fix “this” . . .

This may be hard for some to hear, but I believe the answer can be summed up in three words . . . DO. YOUR. JOB. 

Cops

In light of the past few days, in light of the words of our President, in light of the words of Mrs. Clinton, in light of the words of the BLM crowd and the New Black Panthers crowd, of the Congressional Black Caucus, of the Jessy Jackson’s of the world . . . it’s a hell of a lot to ask of you.  Yet, the request must be made . . . do your job.

We, as a nation, need you to put on your duty gear and go to work each and every day.  You’re that “thin blue line” that is our last resort to keep the wheels “on”.  If you quit, the wheels well and truly come off . . . and that will not end well for any of us.  I can only imagine the temptation to walk away . . . to slow your response when called . . . Those of us who have never warn an officer’s gear, never responded to the call of an active shooter or armed robbery or armed assault have no way of knowing the life you have chosen to lead.  Thank you for your choice . . . we are all safer for your efforts.

And again, the request must be made . . . do your job, please.

Men

Do your job . . . be a man!

Become educated, get a job . . . or volunteer until you find a job.

A “baby daddy” is NOT being a man . . . it’s being an irresponsible asshole and placing a tremendous burden on a woman who really needs you to man-up!!  If you’re not ready to become a father – take all proper precautions, or simply choose not to have sex.  It is NOT the woman’s responsibility to not get pregnant . . . it’s yours as well.

It should be a simple thing . . . but, don’t be a criminal – in any way, shape or form.  Don’t rob, cheat or kill.  Don’t use or sell drugs.  Use a firearm to defend your family, and not to aid in a crime.

Be a father . . . a real, honest to god father.  Be a good example, demand excellence, love your kids, love your wife, protect them, provide for them, lead them.

Go to church . . . have God in your life and in your home.  Understand that your family is His gift to you . . . and you are His gift to them.  Bring your children up to understand His teachings.

Women

Do your job . . . be a woman!

Become educated, get a job . . . or volunteer until you find a job.  And yes . . . “housekeeper”, “stay at home mom” or any other similar description of a woman who takes care of her home and family . . . is a full time job, and then some.

A child is not a ticket to a bigger welfare check . . . they’re a valuable human being.  Know the difference.  If you’re not ready to be called “mommy” . . . then take all precautions to insure you do not become pregnant.  Including the liberal use of the word “NO!”. 

As with a man . . . it should be a simple thing to not become a criminal – in any way, shape or form.  Don’t rob, cheat or kill.  Don’t use or sell drugs.  Use a firearm to defend your family and not to aid in a crime.

Be a mother . . . a real, honest to god mother.  Be a good example, demand excellence, love your kids, love your husband, protect them, work with them, support them, lead them.

Go to church . . . have God in your life and in your home.  Understand that your family is His gift to you . . . and you are His gift to them.  Bring your children up to understand His teachings.

Family

Do your job . . . be a family!

Life is tough, the challenges many.  The salvation to this is the “family”.  In my day it was defined as a “nuclear family” – mother, father and children . . . with grandparents thrown in if we were all lucky.  To me, this is still the goal – whole, solid, complete nuclear families.  For many, that’s not the case.  For men unwilling to be men . . . for men that abandon their child’s mother and their children . . . they leave behind a stress filled life for the woman and her children.  And yet, even here, we see families step up, do the hard work and “do the job” of raising good, well-educated citizens.

Conversely, we see single fathers, abandon by their wives and raising good, well-educated children.  In both these cases, it is harder?  Sure . . . but impossible – not even close.

For the ideal situation, a full on nuclear family . . . do your job.  Be loving of each other, demand excellence from each other, be forgiving, be a good role model. 

Go to church . . . have God in your life and in your home.  Understand that your family is His gift to you . . . and you are His gift to them.  Bring your children up to understand His teachings.

It is here . . . right here . . . where I personally believe our nation went off the tracks.  When the idea of family became a throw-away idea.  When fathers morphed into “baby daddies” and mothers began to look at their children as a paycheck . . . we lost our way.

The solution is not to be found is a group like Black Lives Matter . . . or White Lives Matter . . . or Hispanic Lives Matter . . . or Chinese Lives Matter . . . or German Lives Matter . . . or the local, state or federal government . . . the solution is closer . . . much, much, much closer to “home” . . .

It’s not to be found in legislation, in federal police forces, honestly it’s not to be found in schools or churches.

The answer is not “out there” . . . it’s “in here” . . .

Do Your Job!!!!!

Be a Man . . . Be a Woman . . . Be a family . . .

And then . . . and only then . . . will we begin to right this ship and change our course . . .




Monday, July 4, 2016

Review – AAR Gunsite 150

One of the things I continue to harp on with the instructors I teach and the students I teach is that taking on-going, life long coursework is simply a must.  The idea that an individual can simply take a 4-hour quickie, or a single full day set of coursework . . . and be “good to go” for the rest of their life is profoundly short sighted.

Yes . . . I understand that the 2nd Amendment is your right to carry . . .

Yes . . . I understand you spent time in the military, time in the jungle, time in the sandbox (and – truly – thank you for your service, your sacrifice is what keeps our country safe and free from foreign attack) . . .

Yes . . . I understand that YOU are the instructor . . . and that YOU teach coursework and simply do not have time to actually take coursework . . .

Yes . . . I understand you visit the range “frequently” and send rounds downrange . . .

I get all that.  I also understand that there are a number of top tier sets of coursework out there . . . and that many disagree with methods and techniques taught by other schools.  Yet, the “good” instructors will be able to clearly articulate the WHY of their approach, their methods, their drills, their flow . . . without disparaging their professional competitors.  It is YOUR responsibility as a shooter to see if what they are offering fits within the choices you are making.  Bottom line here . . . no one has ALL the answers or has the single BEST set of course work . . . yet each dedicated professional instructor does their absolute best to deliver to the student the “best” of what they teach each and every day of each and every course.  I was NOT DISAPPOINTED with the Gunsite 150 course in any way, shape or form.

This year the coursework I chose to attend was the Gunsite 150 course.  I chose this particular course because it “travels” from the home base of Gunsite Ranch in Paulden, AZ.  At “the ranch” their primary pistol course is the “250” course – 5 days including both indoor and outdoor simulators.  The 150 course omits those exercises that are conducted using the simulators and focus on the square range work.  This drops the length by 2 days and allows it to be more flexible so that it can be taught off site.  The Indiana 150 course I took was conducted at the Putnam County’s EMS building for the classroom portions and their newly refurbished pistol range right next door.  The facilities were excellent and the hospitality shown by the sheriff’s department was great.  As a side note one of the Sheriff’s Deputies as well as a “soon to go to the academy” Sherriff’s recruit were students in the coursework.

I’ve chatted about budgeting training dollars each year – for coursework, travel and ammunition.  Quality coursework costs money – simple as that.  If you have to travel to take it, that also costs money.  It also costs time . . . something, frankly, that is typically a little tight for me.  A 3-day course in Indiana with two of those days being on a weekend – I can do that.  A 5-day course, plus travel, in Arizona gets much more difficult to accomplish.  That was another reason for the choice of the Indiana 150 course.    A reasonable summary of the course costs would be . . .

·        Course Cost - $850

·        Lodging – 4 nights total with some meals included - $650

·        Misc travel expenses - $100

·        Gas – 800 miles R/T – 42 gal - ~$2.50/gal - $105

·        Ammo – 1,000 rounds - $220 (we used approximately 700 rounds)

·        Total course cost . . . $1,925

Now . . . before your heart stops and you gasp at the price . . . just a quick reality check.  Let me say this slow one more time . . . GOOD COURSEWORK COSTS REAL MONEY . . . period . . . get over it.

Gunsite is one of “those” destinations that is simply a “have to” in my book, and this was the most cost effective way I could find to accomplish this particular goal.  If you live in the Midwest I would urge you to consider it.

There are also many “preconceptions” on what a  course will be like, what they will teach, how they will teach . . . and I am no exception to this particular phenomenon.  I read all the reviews I could (most were years old), I’ve read most if not all of Col Cooper’s writings, watched many of the interviews of him on youtube . . . I tried to do my homework.  I came away with a few things I thought I “knew” . . . the “Modern Technique” would focus on the Weaver Stance, emphasize the 80/20 push pull grip and all the instructors would be shooting (and pushing) the .45cal 1911.  Yep, I just knew this is how it would be.  (reality proved to be much different).  Bottom line, I’d never taken any formal instruction in the “Modern Technique” and saw this as a way to fix that particular problem.

One other player in the equation was the weather – so let me mention it, and then I will leave it out of the equation for the rest of the discussion.  It was “hot” . . . as in the gates of hell hot.  The shooting pad was brand new – we were the first shooters to use the range since its update.  It was the standard very light grey crushed limestone which acted as the perfect reflector for the sun that seemed intent on cooking us where we stood.  Temps remained in the very high 80s to low to mid 90s with heat indexes in the low 100s.  Hydration, good cover clothing and sunscreen were simply a necessity.  The first day I drank 6 quarts of water . . . without a single “head call”.  So I continued to drink heavily that evening and the next morning and finally “caught up”.  If you take summer coursework . . . drink water . . . constantly . . . period.

The beneficial part of the extreme heat is simply the stress factor.  It truly helped me – and most I think – focus their efforts on the task at hand – gun handling and marksmanship. 

Let’s chat a bit about gear.  When I take coursework I always shoot my carry gun – a Glock 17 with the claw rear site and a trijicon large green square front site.  And, I always take a duplicate (with the exception of Truglo front and rear sites) Glock 17 with me.  Old saying “two is one, one is none” may well prove accurate and – as I said – this coursework costs real money.  Nothing would suck more than to get on the range and have your one and only firearm die in your hands.  Take two . . . always . . .

I typically like to shoot the coursework the way I carry – concealed at 4 o’clock with a blade-tech IWB holster and a single magazine in my rear left pocket.  Since the instructors have no idea of the level of skill of the shooters – their requirements are a bit different.  LEOs shoot in their duty gear.  Civilians must use an OWB holster (I used the Blackhawk Sportster), a two-mag pouch carrier and all shooting is done in an unconcealed manner.  The differences are minor as long as you place the holster in the same location and the mag carriers as close to the rear pocket as you can.

The other thing that was encouraged was to throw 50-100 rounds of ammo in your pocket so you could top off magazines while the opposite flight of shooters were on the line.  This is kind of a toss-up instructor to instructor.  About half I’ve taken from like this idea and half like to take a break to reload and chat about the previous drill.  I like the ammo in the pocket – it saves time and gets the shooters more time on the line.

Instructors

You can have the absolute best coursework available . . . but if the instructors presenting it have no real teaching talent . . . little is learned.  The “do it my way ‘cause I said so” days within the firearms training world are long since gone.  If that is the primary fallback position of your instructor – or if that is YOUR primary fallback position – find a different instructor, or become a better instructor.  I believe we had 17 shooters in the class that was divided up into two flights of 9 and 8.  We had 3 instructors which gave a 3-1 ration of shooter to instructor on the range.  That’s a nice ratio!  They all paced the line offering a word here and there – insuring what one might have missed another caught.

Jay was the lead instructor.  A former marine and retired LEO he was what I would consider a modern day “warrior” with approximately 16 years under his belt teaching Gunsite coursework.  He was very skilled in the use of his carry weapon but also trains in various types of hand to hand work, knife fighting and even some sword work.  He made clear that this coursework was a “gunfighting” class and that was indeed the focus of virtually all drills.  How can you insure that you get the first accurate hit should the world truly go sideways in a very big way?

He was tempered and direct in his feedback, honest, progressively more demanding as our time went on and always perfectly clear in what he wanted and expected. 

Pete is an LEO and trainer from South Philadelphia.  I believe he said he’s been teaching Gunsite coursework for nearly 10 years.  He too also falls easily in the category of a modern day warrior.  Of course he is still on the street as part of his work as both a trainer and patrol officer with the police department in Philadelphia.  He could bring to the fore how the techniques they taught played into his daily life as a LEO.  While some instructors imply how things work, all three of ours brought real world experience to the table.  He would take the time to help adjust the smallest things.  For me specifically it was the positioning of my dominant foot and the way my support hand joined my dominant hand during the presentation of my weapon.  Little things that made big differences.

Jerrod was a local officer that had been a Gunsite trainer for 6 years if memory serves.  We had the honor of shooting on a pistol range named in memory of his father.  You could tell that meant a lot to him.  The description of “warrior” applies to him as well with a broad range of training from firearms to hand to hand to knife fighting.  All three had a very broad base of fighting knowledge.  He too would deliver specific parts of the lectures as well as offer feedback to individual shooters during the drills.  The best piece he offered me came during a “headshot” drill.  The previous drill at 3 yards went well.  At 5 – not so much.  His comment . . . “How the heck did you go from hero to zero so quick??”  Heavy sigh.  In watching me he noticed I was taking longer to press off the shot.  He simply said “when you sight picture is right, finish the trigger press”.  It seemed I was waiting for the perfect alignment . . . while when I finished my drive, with the slack taken up . . . I truly was already on target.  So, I simply finished the press.  The result was MUCH BETTER with rounds quickly falling into the “ocular cavity”.

 Little things, little things, little things . . . foot position, trigger take up, smooth press, earlier joining . . . all fine-tune a shooter . . . and all make them a quicker and more accurate gunfighter.

Preconceptions

Things I “knew” going in to this . . .

·        All instructors would shoot and promote the .45cal 1911.

·        The “Weaver Stance” would be demanded.

·        The concept of “Modern Technique” would be hammered home.

The reality was something quite different . . . there was not a single 1911 amongst the instructors to be found.  The Weaver Stance had been replaced (and is being replaced throughout their coursework) with a “Balanced Fighting Stance” and at the end of three days the phrase “Modern Technique” meant to me – placing rounds on target quickly and in a combat effective way.

Defensive Weapon

The primary argument made for the selection of a defensive weapon revolved around elements of the Combat Triad . . . Gun Handling and Marksmanship.  If you can’t run your gun . . . what good is it.  And, if you can’t hit what you’re aiming at . . . things won’t end well.  We had a segment on Terminal Ballistics in one of the lecture periods.  The bottom line is that if you look at a 9mm, .40 or a .45 the differences between terminal ballistics of a modern defensive round is virtually non-existent.  So, find a defensive weapon – in any of these calibers – that you can run and shoot well.

 One thing I have noticed in coursework I’ve taken is that many times folks simply don’t run large volumes of ammunition through their defensive carry weapon.  The result being that they truly have no idea whether they can run their gun or not.   One of the shooters on the line was carrying a full sized .45 1911.  While they were certainly accurate with the firearm, the presentation was very slow and they had real difficulty simply running the gun.  The first two days all three instructors worked with the shooter to make sure they were getting the most out of the weapon that they could but in the final analysis the gun was simply too large physically to make a good match with the shooter.  On the 3rd and final day someone loaned the shooter a 9mm M&P Shield.  The difference was remarkable and the shooter left the course much more confident and ready for a shopping trip!

First Day

 First day was an in brief, the distribution of course material – name tags, name placards for the desk, course book, review sheets, emergency contact info, hold harmless agreements, a metal water bottle, a pen . . . everything needed to get things rolling.

We covered Coopers 4 safety rules, talked about the Combat Triad (Gun Handling, Marksmanship and Mindset), outlined the flow of the course, answered initial questions, went through introductions and the remaining administrative items.  Then we headed to the range.

The target shot was the Speedwell Gunsite Target.  The entire target is covered in a sand colored camo with very indistinct outlines of the desired “hit” areas – “high center mass” area as well as the “brain box”.  The idea for this style of target is to get the shooter used to shooting at an area on a threat rather than shooting at a defined and outlined target area.

The afternoon began with simple single round shooting drills from the low ready.  The holster was a storage device at this point, not the starting point for the drills.

Day one was simple drills – single rounds to high center mass from 3,5 and 7 yards.  Faster, controlled pairs were introduced at the end of the day.  Everything was examined – stance, grip, our extension, shot placement, sight pictures were adjusted . . . all the little things like I referred to earlier were worked on.  The idea – to get everyone ready for the accelerated pace that would begin the following day.

At the end of the day was the first shooter on shooter competition.  Two lines, 30 feet from two 18” steel plates.  On the fire command the first to draw and hit the steel moved on . . . the other went home.  I got my first hit then waited through the line again.  I was the very last shooter and the two in front of me missed . . . so I took home the first Gunsite challenge coin.

The range was run as a hot range.  From the very first “make ready” command until the final exercise at the end of the day where you put your weapon in the state you wanted to put it when you left the range, all firearms were loaded.  Many, when leaving for the day, simply changed out ball ammunition for their defensive carry ammunition.  I was staying at the “Inn at DePauw” which was on the university campus, so I cleared my weapon and left it locked in the vault in my vehicle for the night.

The first day ended with the cobwebs brushed aside, the first round jitters gone and a building excitement for the rest of the week.

Day – and Night – Two

Day two was simply building on day one’s work and increasing our speed.  There were a small group of engagements – single round, controlled pairs and finally a “hammer” – two rounds as quickly as you could press the trigger off a single sight picture.

We also worked on precise shots by through the use of a single shot to the “brain box”.  Drills were worked at all three distances – 3y, 5y and 7Y.  The feedback also continued with suggestions, tweaks, nudges . . . all with an eye toward making us accurate at increasing speeds.

It was also here that folks really began running their guns better.  It was the logical time to introduce malfunction clearing, speed reloads and tactical reloads.  Ammunition management was also worked on during this time.  Breaks were at specific junctures in the coursework and not simply because you ran low on ammo.  Fully loaded magazines when drills commenced, a pocket full of an extra 100 rounds and topping off magazines while the other flight shot their drills kept everyone on the line and the drills moving at a pretty quick pace.

I read an article just this morning on how “Tactical Reloads” will get you killed and it was a bit of a reminder that the word “never” is dependent entirely on context.  The argument against tactical reloads is why on earth would you want to drop a partial magazine in the middle of a gun fight.  Short answer – you wouldn’t.  But – you have a very low magazine, the bad guy in front of you is down and likely dead . . . and their might be a wingman parking the car . . . wouldn’t it make sense to move forward from this point with a fully loaded handgun?  There method was very similar to others I’ve learned and taught and – in context – it makes perfect sense.  So, we worked on tactical reloads and at the end of every drill we were given the opportunity to holster a weapon prepared in the manner we wished to start the next drill.

Finally, for the day shoot another coin was up for grabs.  This time for accuracy.  Same lines, same targets, same “out if you miss” but this time a hit earned you the right to shoot from a farther distance.  I popped out of this one pretty quick.  The winner was two stages back from the 25 yard line . . . let’s call it 40 yards before his competitor dropped a shot.  Very nice shooting.

The first session ended early with an evening start time around 8PM.  This was a low light / almost no light session to get some familiarization with using a flashlight and shooting in low light.  This is something I’ve done while helping training our local PD but virtually none of the “civilian” shooters had ever shot in low light.  Most found it enlightening and definitely a skill set they wanted to work on.  The two primary methods taught was the “FBI Method”, hold your flashlight high and away from your body while pointing it at the threat. And, the Harries method – flashlight held in your support hand, brought up under your dominant hand with the back of the hands pressed together.  That pressure helps stabilize your shooting.  Again, these were introduction drills with all of us expected to work on them when we returned home.  So ended day two.
Day Three

We started with a “cold shoot” - “Hammers” from 3y, 5y and 7y with head shots added in.  Next we were introduced to the “Failure Drill”.  You’ve engaged a threat with a “Hammer” high center mass . . . and nothing – the threat is still up and fighting.  The failure drill is simply a “Hammer” – two rounds high center mass off a single sight picture, and a single round to the “brain box”.  In gunny terms – the Mozambique Drill.  While I see much poo-pooing of this drill – in context it again makes sense.  If you have an immediate threat intent on your demise – why hit them with two rounds and wait and see” Or 3,4 or 5 rounds?  Two rounds center mass and one to the “brain box” will go a long way to making your day better. As with all of these drills – context, context, context . . . one size will never, ever fit all.

We moved on to use of cover and ended the day one more time with two lines at 30 feet, two 18” steel plates . . . miss you’re out, fastest you move on, slowest – you’re out.  I gotta say with just a touch of pride that I managed to bring this challenge coin home as well.

We finished with a brass pick up, final Q and A and the handing out of certificates for the completion of 24 hours of training from Gunsite.

Final Thoughts

Very good course.  Beyond excellent instructors.  The flow was well thought-out with one drill building on another.  Virtually no wasted time – we were either talking gun fighting or practicing gun fighting – never hanging around shooting the bull.   The instructors were profoundly knowledgeable, clear spoken, direct, helpful, demanding and enjoyable.  Bottom line – tons of value here folks, definitely worth looking at should you be in need of coursework later this year or next!

Photos



Other Links


Gunsite was founded in 1976 by Lt. Col. Jeff Cooper, author, columnist, professor, WW II and Korean War combat veteran. Col. Cooper intended Gunsite to be the vehicle for spreading the Modern Technique of the Pistol, which he created during his years in Big Bear Lake, CA.